| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2013-05-25 17:12 EDT |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap |
| Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ View Advanced ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||
| ID | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||
| 0000303 | [Nagios Plugins] Other / Unknown | tweak | always | 2012-03-19 07:57 | 2012-09-18 09:12 | ||
| Reporter | calestyo | View Status | public | ||||
| Assigned To | |||||||
| Priority | normal | Resolution | open | ||||
| Status | closed | ||||||
| Summary | 0000303: improve default APT options for check_apt | ||||||
| Description |
Hi. check_apt uses the following default options: on update: -q on upgrade: -o 'Debug::NoLocking=true' -s -qq The former seems fine to me, but think (maybe I'm wrong), the later can be improved: a) -s I've just reported bug 0000302, where I suggest, that IMHO check_apt shouldn't upgrade per default, but JUST check (even not doing an update). If this was the case, than we could just drop "-s". A user typically _want_s the upgrade if he says -U or -D,.. or at least a notice if it failed (cause he wasn't root). Right now, he does not even get that info, right? b) I'd generally omit -o 'Debug::NoLocking=true' According to the apt-get manual page, simulation (-s) enables "Debug::NoLocking=true" for non-root users anyway and AS a root user,.. one probably wants the locking. c) I'm unsure about -qq The apt-get manual page, specifically warns: >you should never use -qq without a no-action modifier such as >-d, --print-uris or -s as APT may decided to do something you >did not expect. If (a) above would be accepted, than we'd no longer fulfil this, as "-s" was gone. What should we do then? Just "-q". Cheers, Chris btw: I'd write patches if the ideas themselves were accepted. |
||||||
| Additional Information | |||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||
| OS | |||||||
| OS Version | |||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Notes |
|
|
(0000500) calestyo (reporter) 2012-07-01 15:45 |
The proposals as described above were partially invalid. I corrected them and forwarded it to: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3539330&group_id=29880&atid=397597 [^] Please close the issue here. |
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2012-03-19 07:57 | calestyo | New Issue | |
| 2012-07-01 15:45 | calestyo | Note Added: 0000500 | |
| 2012-09-18 09:12 | ageric | Status | new => closed |
| Mantis 1.1.7[^] Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group |